{"id":18870,"date":"2026-11-04T14:02:42","date_gmt":"2026-11-04T06:02:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/?p=18870"},"modified":"2026-10-22T14:27:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-22T06:27:00","slug":"how-factories-balance-standard-models-and-market-specific-product-variants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/how-factories-balance-standard-models-and-market-specific-product-variants\/","title":{"rendered":"How Factories Balance Standard Models and Market-Specific Product Variants"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-18871 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1672\" height=\"940\" srcset=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7.png 1672w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-18x10.png 18w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-600x337.png 600w, https:\/\/shefmon.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/exec-a89b16f7-1122-4740-9e76-8eb171049de7-150x84.png 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1672px) 100vw, 1672px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Beauty device factories serve markets that differ in language, electrical supply, distributor capabilities, professional settings, treatment preferences, documentation, packaging, and product configuration. These differences create legitimate requests for market-specific versions. At the same time, every additional variant adds work for engineering, purchasing, production, quality, inventory, sales, training, and after-sales service.<\/p>\n<p>A factory therefore needs two strengths at once. It needs stable standard models that can be built and supported repeatedly, and it needs a controlled way to adapt those models when a regional requirement is real. Too little flexibility can make a product unsuitable for important buyers. Too much flexibility can turn one model into a collection of undocumented machines that share a name but not a reliable factory baseline.<\/p>\n<p>This guide explains how beauty device manufacturers can preserve a common product core while creating approved market-specific variants. It covers request qualification, variant types, architecture, configuration records, verification, supply, production, inventory, commercial data, service, and lifecycle decisions, with examples from SHEFMON facial, hair-removal, body-care, HIFU, and RF microneedling products.<\/p>\n<h2>\uc694\uc57d \ubcf4\uace0\uc11c<\/h2>\n<p>A factory can balance standard models and market variants by following eight principles:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Protect a controlled standard baseline.<\/strong> Every model needs an approved core covering hardware, software, components, interfaces, tests, documents, and standard accessories.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Require a clear reason for variation.<\/strong> A variant should solve a traceable regional, technical, professional, channel, or documentation need rather than reflect an informal preference.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Classify the requested difference.<\/strong> Language, voltage, plug, label, software, handle package, consumable, housing, documentation, and functional changes do not carry the same impact.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Use modular architecture where practical.<\/strong> Common systems and defined interfaces can support controlled choices without redesigning the complete product.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Approve the smallest effective change.<\/strong> A document update, selectable option, standard configuration, or regional package may solve the need without creating a separate variant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evaluate the full operational cost.<\/strong> Low-volume variants can affect components, inventory, assembly, testing, packaging, training, spares, service, and installed-base records.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Give every approved variant its own identity.<\/strong> The factory, distributor, and service team must be able to identify exactly what was ordered, built, shipped, and installed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Review variants throughout their lifecycle.<\/strong> The factory should consolidate repeated demand, restrict weak versions, and retire variants whose value no longer justifies their complexity.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The goal is not to eliminate variation. It is to make every variation deliberate, traceable, buildable, and supportable.<\/p>\n<h2>1. What Is a Standard Beauty Device Model?<\/h2>\n<p>A standard model is the factory&#8217;s approved product baseline for routine quotation, production, inspection, documentation, and support. It should define:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>official product identity;<\/li>\n<li>intended buyer and application role;<\/li>\n<li>controlled hardware architecture;<\/li>\n<li>bill of materials;<\/li>\n<li>software and interface version;<\/li>\n<li>standard functions;<\/li>\n<li>included handles and accessories;<\/li>\n<li>compatible options and consumables;<\/li>\n<li>electrical and mechanical specifications;<\/li>\n<li>production and quality controls;<\/li>\n<li>packaging and labels;<\/li>\n<li>manuals and training information;<\/li>\n<li>service parts; and<\/li>\n<li>markets or channels where it is approved.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u201cStandard\u201d does not mean one universal package for every country. It means the factory has established a repeatable baseline against which approved differences can be identified.<\/p>\n<h2>2. What Is a Market-Specific Product Variant?<\/h2>\n<p>A market-specific variant is a formally approved version of a standard model created for defined countries, regions, buyer groups, or channels. It retains a relationship to the standard product while controlling one or more meaningful differences.<\/p>\n<p>Variants may address:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>system language;<\/li>\n<li>voltage, frequency, plug, or power configuration;<\/li>\n<li>labeling and documentation;<\/li>\n<li>software parameters or interface organization;<\/li>\n<li>handles, applicators, spot sizes, cartridges, or tips;<\/li>\n<li>consumable and accessory packages;<\/li>\n<li>housing, branding, or packaging;<\/li>\n<li>market-specific professional-use expectations;<\/li>\n<li>distributor service capability; or<\/li>\n<li>a technical requirement supported by regional demand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A variant is more than a sales nickname. It needs an exact configuration, approval record, verification scope, production identity, and support plan.<\/p>\n<h2>3. Why the Balance Is Difficult<\/h2>\n<p>Standardization and market fit create different benefits.<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-wrap\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Standard-model advantage<\/th>\n<th>Variant advantage<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Stable components and suppliers<\/td>\n<td>Better fit for defined market requirements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Repeatable assembly and testing<\/td>\n<td>Relevant language, documentation, and electrical setup<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Simpler training and service<\/td>\n<td>Configuration matched to buyer workflow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Consolidated inventory<\/td>\n<td>Stronger distributor positioning in a region<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Clearer product data<\/td>\n<td>Ability to respond to legitimate local needs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Easier spare-parts planning<\/td>\n<td>Controlled differentiation from a global base model<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>The decision becomes difficult when the commercial benefit of a variant is visible immediately while the operational cost appears gradually across departments.<\/p>\n<h2>4. Begin with the Common Product Core<\/h2>\n<p>The factory should state which parts of a model remain common wherever it is sold. The common core may include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>product architecture;<\/li>\n<li>main enclosure and frame;<\/li>\n<li>power and control principles;<\/li>\n<li>critical safety and performance requirements;<\/li>\n<li>software foundation;<\/li>\n<li>connectors and interfaces;<\/li>\n<li>approved components;<\/li>\n<li>manufacturing process;<\/li>\n<li>test methods;<\/li>\n<li>service approach; and<\/li>\n<li>product identity rules.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The common core protects reliability and manufacturing control. A requested change that affects it requires more review than a selectable language or approved accessory package.<\/p>\n<h2>5. Use a Product-Variation Hierarchy<\/h2>\n<p>Not every market difference needs a separate variant.<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-wrap\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\uc218\uc900<\/th>\n<th>\uc124\uba85<\/th>\n<th>Example response<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Commercial presentation<\/td>\n<td>Sales material changes without changing the delivered product<\/td>\n<td>Localized brochure using approved claims<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Documentation package<\/td>\n<td>Product stays the same but controlled language or instructions differ<\/td>\n<td>Approved manual and label set<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Selectable option<\/td>\n<td>An existing compatible item is chosen<\/td>\n<td>Approved handpiece, tip, cartridge, or accessory<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\ud45c\uc900 \uad6c\uc131<\/td>\n<td>A repeatable package combines existing approved elements<\/td>\n<td>Named salon or clinic package<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Market variant<\/td>\n<td>A defined market receives a controlled technical or documentary version<\/td>\n<td>Voltage, software, label, or hardware variant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Separate model<\/td>\n<td>The difference creates a distinct buyer role or substantial technical identity<\/td>\n<td>New model with its own baseline<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Custom project<\/td>\n<td>The change is buyer-specific and outside the standard range<\/td>\n<td>Controlled OEM\/ODM project<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>This hierarchy helps the factory select the lowest level that fully controls the requirement.<\/p>\n<h2>6. Capture the Original Market Request<\/h2>\n<p>Variant requests should enter through a standard record rather than an informal message. Capture:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>requesting distributor, buyer, or regional team;<\/li>\n<li>\ubaa9\uc801\uc9c0 \uc2dc\uc7a5;<\/li>\n<li>target business type;<\/li>\n<li>standard model being considered;<\/li>\n<li>\uc694\uccad\ub41c \ucc28\uc774;<\/li>\n<li>reason the standard version does not fit;<\/li>\n<li>whether the difference is required or preferred;<\/li>\n<li>expected order and repeat-demand context;<\/li>\n<li>local professional, technical, or documentation basis;<\/li>\n<li>requested timing;<\/li>\n<li>known alternatives; and<\/li>\n<li>unanswered questions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Preserving the original request helps the factory determine whether the problem is product design, configuration, training, documentation, or commercial positioning.<\/p>\n<h2>7. Separate Mandatory Requirements from Preferences<\/h2>\n<p>Market teams often combine several needs in one request. Classify each item as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>mandatory for the destination market or approved use;<\/li>\n<li>required by the distributor&#8217;s operating model;<\/li>\n<li>necessary for a defined buyer workflow;<\/li>\n<li>preferred for commercial positioning;<\/li>\n<li>optional convenience; or<\/li>\n<li>exploratory request without sufficient evidence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Mandatory claims should be supported by qualified review, especially when they concern local professional, technical, or market-access rules. A preference may still justify a variant, but it should not be presented as a universal requirement.<\/p>\n<h2>8. Classify the Type of Variation<\/h2>\n<p>Different changes affect different factory systems.<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-wrap\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Variation type<\/th>\n<th>\uc608\uc2dc<\/th>\n<th>Main review areas<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Language and content<\/td>\n<td>Interface language, manual, label, training<\/td>\n<td>Translation control, layout, software, document approval<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\uc804\uae30 \uac19\uc740<\/td>\n<td>Voltage, frequency, plug, power component<\/td>\n<td>Engineering, sourcing, testing, labels, service<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\uc18c\ud504\ud2b8\uc6e8\uc5b4<\/td>\n<td>Parameters, modes, interface flow, region setting<\/td>\n<td>Version control, verification, loading, support<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Functional<\/td>\n<td>Added or removed function, new operating mode<\/td>\n<td>Requirements, risk, engineering, verification, production<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Handle or applicator<\/td>\n<td>Handpiece, spot size, cartridge, tip, connector<\/td>\n<td>Compatibility, performance, package, training, spares<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\uc18c\ubaa8\ud488<\/td>\n<td>Formula, tip, needle, filter, bottle, cartridge<\/td>\n<td>Compatibility, supply, labeling, storage, reorder support<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\uae30\uacc4\uc801\uc778<\/td>\n<td>Housing, internal layout, storage, connector location<\/td>\n<td>Design, tooling, assembly, packaging, service access<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Branding and packaging<\/td>\n<td>Logo, color, carton, inserts<\/td>\n<td>Artwork, product identity, inventory, approval<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>A language file and a new handpiece should not follow the same approval path merely because both were requested by one market.<\/p>\n<h2>9. Test the Strength of Market Evidence<\/h2>\n<p>A variant is easier to justify when evidence is repeatable and traceable. Review:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>number of independent qualified buyers;<\/li>\n<li>consistency of requested specifications;<\/li>\n<li>confirmed reason the standard model is unsuitable;<\/li>\n<li>quotations and order progress;<\/li>\n<li>distributor commitment and capability;<\/li>\n<li>likely demand duration;<\/li>\n<li>regional concentration;<\/li>\n<li>effect on bundles and product positioning;<\/li>\n<li>support readiness; and<\/li>\n<li>willingness to accept the practical cost of the difference.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>One large buyer can justify a controlled custom project. It does not automatically justify a permanent market variant for the standard portfolio.<\/p>\n<h2>10. Evaluate Strategic and Portfolio Fit<\/h2>\n<p>The factory should ask whether the variant strengthens the intended role of the base model.<\/p>\n<p>\uc720\uc6a9\ud55c \uc9c8\ubb38\uc740 \ub2e4\uc74c\uacfc \uac19\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Does it help the model serve the same buyer more effectively?<\/li>\n<li>Does it open a clearly defined market?<\/li>\n<li>Does it create a coherent regional version or just another exception?<\/li>\n<li>Will it overlap another model?<\/li>\n<li>Can sales teams explain when to choose the standard product and when to choose the variant?<\/li>\n<li>Could the requested difference become a global improvement?<\/li>\n<li>Does the version support the factory&#8217;s category and platform strategy?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A variant that changes the target buyer or core service role may actually need to become a separate model.<\/p>\n<h2>11. Assess Technical Impact before Commercial Approval<\/h2>\n<p>Engineering should map the requested difference to affected systems:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>product requirements;<\/li>\n<li>mechanical layout;<\/li>\n<li>electrical and power systems;<\/li>\n<li>cooling, airflow, vacuum, or fluid paths;<\/li>\n<li>software and interface;<\/li>\n<li>handles, connectors, and accessories;<\/li>\n<li>supplier parts;<\/li>\n<li>production tools and fixtures;<\/li>\n<li>inspection and test methods;<\/li>\n<li>packaging;<\/li>\n<li>maintenance; and<\/li>\n<li>installed-base compatibility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The assessment should identify what can remain common, what must change, what needs verification, and what uncertainty remains.<\/p>\n<h2>12. Design for Controlled Modularity<\/h2>\n<p>Modular design can help a factory serve several markets from a common base. Practical modules may include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>language files;<\/li>\n<li>regional power and plug sets;<\/li>\n<li>replaceable interface or label packages;<\/li>\n<li>approved handpiece families;<\/li>\n<li>controlled cartridge or tip systems;<\/li>\n<li>optional software modules;<\/li>\n<li>standardized connectors;<\/li>\n<li>configurable accessory trays; and<\/li>\n<li>common packaging with controlled inserts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Modularity works only when interfaces and compatibility are defined. A connector that physically fits does not by itself prove that the handle, software, power, and operating limits are compatible.<\/p>\n<h2>13. Decide When a Difference Belongs in Software<\/h2>\n<p>Software can reduce hardware proliferation, but it can also create hidden versions. The factory should decide whether a market difference can be controlled through:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>selectable language;<\/li>\n<li>configuration file;<\/li>\n<li>enabled feature set;<\/li>\n<li>parameter range;<\/li>\n<li>screen sequence;<\/li>\n<li>unit display;<\/li>\n<li>regional default; or<\/li>\n<li>separate software build.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Every approved software state needs an identifier, compatible hardware definition, loading method, verification record, production check, update rule, and service reference. Unlimited hidden settings can become harder to govern than a visible hardware variant.<\/p>\n<h2>14. Decide When a Difference Requires Hardware<\/h2>\n<p>A hardware change may be necessary when the requirement affects power, cooling, performance, handle interface, component availability, mechanical fit, or other physical behavior.<\/p>\n<p>Before approving it, review:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>whether an existing approved part solves the need;<\/li>\n<li>compatibility with the common platform;<\/li>\n<li>supplier readiness;<\/li>\n<li>tooling and assembly changes;<\/li>\n<li>verification and final-test changes;<\/li>\n<li>inventory identity;<\/li>\n<li>spare parts;<\/li>\n<li>service instructions; and<\/li>\n<li>future substitution risk.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Hardware differences should remain visible in the bill of materials and product identity. They should not depend on production staff remembering which region receives which unrecorded part.<\/p>\n<h2>15. Standardize Language and Documentation Variants<\/h2>\n<p>Language adaptation can appear simple, but it affects several controlled assets:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>on-screen text;<\/li>\n<li>parameter names and units;<\/li>\n<li>alerts and warnings;<\/li>\n<li>labels;<\/li>\n<li>\uc0ac\uc6a9\uc790 \uc124\uba85\uc11c;<\/li>\n<li>maintenance instructions;<\/li>\n<li>training material;<\/li>\n<li>\uc900\ube44\ubb3c \ubaa9\ub85d;<\/li>\n<li>quotation and specification sheet; and<\/li>\n<li>website or distributor content.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The translation process should define source text, qualified review, version, layout check, software build, market assignment, and change synchronization. Updating the manual without updating the interface can create confusion for operators and service teams.<\/p>\n<h2>16. Control Electrical and Power Variants<\/h2>\n<p>Voltage, frequency, plug, power supply, fuse, cable, label, and internal component differences require technical review. The factory should record:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\ubaa9\uc801\uc9c0 \uc2dc\uc7a5;<\/li>\n<li>approved input range;<\/li>\n<li>plug and cable specification;<\/li>\n<li>affected power components;<\/li>\n<li>product label;<\/li>\n<li>bill of materials;<\/li>\n<li>incoming and production tests;<\/li>\n<li>packaging identity;<\/li>\n<li>service part; and<\/li>\n<li>verification evidence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Commercial teams should not infer electrical suitability from plug shape alone.<\/p>\n<h2>17. Govern Handle, Applicator, and Spot-Size Variants<\/h2>\n<p>Handles can change the way a device performs, is positioned, is tested, and is supported. The factory should define:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>approved base model and software;<\/li>\n<li>handle identifier;<\/li>\n<li>connector and recognition method;<\/li>\n<li>operating limits;<\/li>\n<li>spot size, treatment head, or applicator identity;<\/li>\n<li>required cooling or power;<\/li>\n<li>calibration or test method where applicable;<\/li>\n<li>\ud3ec\ud568\ub41c \uc561\uc138\uc11c\ub9ac;<\/li>\n<li>training and documentation;<\/li>\n<li>replacement compatibility; and<\/li>\n<li>quotation and packaging status.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>When several handles are available, the quotation should specify the exact package instead of listing every possible option as if all were included.<\/p>\n<h2>18. Use A0426 to Illustrate Technical Variant Control<\/h2>\n<p>\uadf8\ub9cc\ud07c <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/product\/a0426-755-1064-810-940nm-diode-laser-hair-removal-beauty-machine\/\">A0426 diode laser hair-removal system<\/a> page lists wavelength choices of 755, 810, 940, and 1064 nm, multiple spot sizes, cooling, and several interface languages.<\/p>\n<p>This type of configurable product requires the factory to link:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>approved wavelength arrangement;<\/li>\n<li>matching handpiece and spot size;<\/li>\n<li>power and cooling configuration;<\/li>\n<li>software and parameter set;<\/li>\n<li>\uc778\ud130\ud398\uc774\uc2a4 \uc5b8\uc5b4;<\/li>\n<li>regional documentation;<\/li>\n<li>bill of materials;<\/li>\n<li>production test; and<\/li>\n<li>replacement-handpiece record.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The public model name can remain consistent while the exact deliverable is governed through an identifiable configuration or variant.<\/p>\n<h2>19. Use A0648 to Illustrate Package Variants<\/h2>\n<p>\uadf8\ub9cc\ud07c <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/product\/a0648-9-in-1-diamond-hydro-microdermabrasion-peeling-machine\/\">A0648 9-in-1 \ud558\uc774\ub4dc\ub85c \ub9c8\uc774\ud06c\ub85c\ub354\ub9c8\ube0c\ub808\uc774\uc158 \uc2dc\uc2a4\ud15c<\/a> is positioned around several facial roles including cleansing, exfoliation, extraction, and hydration.<\/p>\n<p>Market-specific requests may concern:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>included handles and tips;<\/li>\n<li>bottle and liquid-path accessories;<\/li>\n<li>\uc5b8\uc5b4;<\/li>\n<li>voltage and plug;<\/li>\n<li>consumable starter pack;<\/li>\n<li>training package;<\/li>\n<li>branding and carton; or<\/li>\n<li>distributor bundle.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the hardware platform does not change, the factory may be able to use a controlled configuration instead of creating a new variant. The decision depends on whether production, testing, product identity, or support differs meaningfully.<\/p>\n<h2>20. Use B0155 to Illustrate Multifunction Boundaries<\/h2>\n<p>\uadf8\ub9cc\ud07c <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/product\/b0155-desktop-endos-velapro\/\">B0155 \ub370\uc2a4\ud06c\ud0d1 \uc5d4\ub3c4\uc2a4 \ubca8\ub77c\ud504\ub85c<\/a> presents vacuum roller, radio frequency, rotating massage, and 80K cavitation roles across its listed functions.<\/p>\n<p>For a multifunction body platform, the factory should avoid unlimited regional handle combinations. It can define:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>one common console;<\/li>\n<li>approved standard handle set;<\/li>\n<li>optional compatible handles;<\/li>\n<li>named market packages;<\/li>\n<li>software relationship;<\/li>\n<li>accessory storage;<\/li>\n<li>cleaning and training differences;<\/li>\n<li>spare-parts requirements; and<\/li>\n<li>package substitution rules.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This allows regional flexibility while keeping the device understandable for production, distributors, and service teams.<\/p>\n<h2>21. Use A0204 and A0152 to Illustrate Consumable Variants<\/h2>\n<p>\uadf8\ub9cc\ud07c <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/product\/a0204-9d-7d-focused-hifu-machine-5-in-1\/\">A0204 9D\/7D \ud3ec\ucee4\uc2a4\ud615 HIFU \uc2dc\uc2a4\ud15c<\/a> \uadf8\ub9ac\uace0 <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/product\/a0152-desktop-mmrf-deepth-8-microneedling-rf\/\">A0152 RF \ub9c8\uc774\ud06c\ub85c\ub2c8\ub4e4\ub9c1 \uc2dc\uc2a4\ud15c<\/a> show why cartridges, tips, needles, handles, and other recurring items must stay connected to the correct device configuration.<\/p>\n<p>Market packages should define:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>standard and optional consumables;<\/li>\n<li>compatible model and version;<\/li>\n<li>identifiers and packaging;<\/li>\n<li>professional-user and workflow expectations;<\/li>\n<li>storage, cleaning, or disposal information where applicable;<\/li>\n<li>reorder process;<\/li>\n<li>distributor inventory responsibility;<\/li>\n<li>replacement or transition rules; and<\/li>\n<li>effect of a consumable change on current units.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A market-specific starter pack can remain a commercial configuration if the approved device and consumables do not change. A new cartridge or tip with different technical behavior requires deeper review.<\/p>\n<h2>22. Build a Variant Business Case<\/h2>\n<p>The business case should include more than expected sales. Consider:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>qualified demand and repeatability;<\/li>\n<li>development and verification work;<\/li>\n<li>component and supplier costs;<\/li>\n<li>new minimum order quantities;<\/li>\n<li>separate inventory;<\/li>\n<li>production setup and changeover;<\/li>\n<li>test equipment or fixtures;<\/li>\n<li>translation and documentation;<\/li>\n<li>packaging and artwork;<\/li>\n<li>demonstration units;<\/li>\n<li>training;<\/li>\n<li>spare parts and consumables;<\/li>\n<li>warranty and support; and<\/li>\n<li>end-of-life inventory.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Use base, upside, downside, and discontinuation scenarios when evidence remains uncertain. A small revenue opportunity can create a long support obligation.<\/p>\n<h2>23. Use a Variant Decision Scorecard<\/h2>\n<div class=\"table-wrap\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\ucc28\uc6d0<\/th>\n<th>Questions<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Requirement strength<\/td>\n<td>Is the difference mandatory, operationally necessary, or merely preferred?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Demand evidence<\/td>\n<td>Is demand qualified, repeatable, and supported by buyers or orders?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common-core fit<\/td>\n<td>How much of the standard model remains unchanged?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Technical impact<\/td>\n<td>Which hardware, software, components, interfaces, and tests change?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Operational impact<\/td>\n<td>What new sourcing, inventory, assembly, packaging, and documentation are required?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Quality and market impact<\/td>\n<td>What reviews, verification, claims, or market-specific evidence are needed?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Service impact<\/td>\n<td>Can training, diagnostics, spares, consumables, and updates be supported?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Portfolio clarity<\/td>\n<td>Will teams understand when and where the variant should be sold?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lifecycle resilience<\/td>\n<td>Can the factory maintain, consolidate, or retire it responsibly?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Scores can support discussion, but the decision should record evidence, assumptions, conditions, and authority.<\/p>\n<h2>24. Choose among Standardization, Configuration, Variant, and Custom Work<\/h2>\n<p>The factory can make one of several decisions:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Keep the standard model:<\/strong> evidence does not justify change.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Improve the global baseline:<\/strong> the request reveals a useful change for most markets.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Add an approved option:<\/strong> an existing compatible item meets the need.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Create a standard configuration:<\/strong> repeated buyers need the same package of approved elements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Create a market variant:<\/strong> a defined technical or documentary difference is justified for a market.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Open a custom project:<\/strong> the request is buyer-specific and separately controlled.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Create a separate model:<\/strong> the difference changes product identity or market role.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hold or decline:<\/strong> evidence, feasibility, support, or strategic fit is insufficient.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The decision should name the owner and the conditions under which it will be reviewed again.<\/p>\n<h2>25. Give Each Variant a Controlled Identity<\/h2>\n<p>An approved variant needs an identifier that follows it through:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>quotation;<\/li>\n<li>sales order;<\/li>\n<li>bill of materials;<\/li>\n<li>software loading;<\/li>\n<li>production instruction;<\/li>\n<li>inspection and final test;<\/li>\n<li>serial-number record;<\/li>\n<li>packaging and labels;<\/li>\n<li>shipping documents;<\/li>\n<li>customer asset registration; and<\/li>\n<li>\uc11c\ube44\uc2a4 \uc774\ub825.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The identifier may be a model suffix, configuration code, market code, or another controlled convention. The method matters less than consistent use.<\/p>\n<h2>26. Maintain a Variant Configuration Record<\/h2>\n<p>\uae30\ub85d\uc5d0\ub294 \ub2e4\uc74c\uacfc \uac19\uc774 \uba85\uc2dc\ub418\uc5b4\uc57c \ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>parent standard model;<\/li>\n<li>reason and approved markets;<\/li>\n<li>complete list of differences;<\/li>\n<li>unique and shared components;<\/li>\n<li>software and language;<\/li>\n<li>handles, accessories, and consumables;<\/li>\n<li>verification and approval evidence;<\/li>\n<li>production and test changes;<\/li>\n<li>labels, manuals, and packaging;<\/li>\n<li>service and spare-parts requirements;<\/li>\n<li>\uc2dc\ud589\uc77c;<\/li>\n<li>owner; and<\/li>\n<li>review or expiry date.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This record becomes the reference when a distributor reorders, a technician requests a part, or a component must change.<\/p>\n<h2>27. Plan Verification by Change Impact<\/h2>\n<p>The verification plan should match the difference. A translated document may need language and layout approval. A new power component, handpiece, software mode, or cartridge may require technical testing and broader regression review.<\/p>\n<p>The factory should document:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>affected requirements;<\/li>\n<li>unchanged evidence that remains applicable;<\/li>\n<li>new or repeated tests;<\/li>\n<li>unit and configuration tested;<\/li>\n<li>acceptance criteria;<\/li>\n<li>results and deviations;<\/li>\n<li>market-specific review; and<\/li>\n<li>final approval.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Assuming that all standard-model evidence automatically covers a variant can leave important changes untested.<\/p>\n<h2>28. Prepare Production for Variant Complexity<\/h2>\n<p>Production needs unambiguous instructions for:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>order and configuration recognition;<\/li>\n<li>material picking;<\/li>\n<li>component substitutions;<\/li>\n<li>software and language loading;<\/li>\n<li>handle and accessory selection;<\/li>\n<li>labels and serial records;<\/li>\n<li>in-process checks;<\/li>\n<li>final test sequence;<\/li>\n<li>packaging; and<\/li>\n<li>segregation of finished units.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Visual differences can help, but they should not replace controlled identifiers and records. Production should also define how a mixed batch is handled and how errors are contained.<\/p>\n<h2>29. Control Variant Inventory<\/h2>\n<p>Variant inventory can accumulate through unique parts, finished devices, packaging, manuals, and spares. Planning should consider:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>demand by exact configuration;<\/li>\n<li>shared versus unique components;<\/li>\n<li>supplier lead time and minimum order;<\/li>\n<li>postponement opportunities;<\/li>\n<li>point in production where the product becomes market-specific;<\/li>\n<li>finished-goods policy;<\/li>\n<li>demonstration and replacement units;<\/li>\n<li>service-parts reserve;<\/li>\n<li>obsolete material risk; and<\/li>\n<li>retirement plan.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Where practical, factories can delay language, plug, documentation, or accessory finalization until demand is confirmed. This reduces finished-goods fragmentation while preserving control.<\/p>\n<h2>30. Align Forecasts with Exact Variants<\/h2>\n<p>A forecast for a base model is not enough when the factory must buy different power parts, handpieces, packaging, or consumables.<\/p>\n<p>Regional and distributor forecasts should specify:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>base model;<\/li>\n<li>market or variant code;<\/li>\n<li>configuration;<\/li>\n<li>unique handles and options;<\/li>\n<li>\uc5b8\uc5b4;<\/li>\n<li>electrical version;<\/li>\n<li>expected order period;<\/li>\n<li>confidence; and<\/li>\n<li>installed-base support demand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Forecast accuracy should be reviewed by variant so weak assumptions do not become excess market-specific inventory.<\/p>\n<h2>31. Keep Website, Catalog, Quotation, and Factory Data Aligned<\/h2>\n<p>Commercial content should make the distinction between standard, optional, and market-specific elements clear. Control:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>product title;<\/li>\n<li>approved specifications;<\/li>\n<li>available variants;<\/li>\n<li>included and optional items;<\/li>\n<li>regional availability;<\/li>\n<li>\ud638\ud658\uc131;<\/li>\n<li>software and language;<\/li>\n<li>product images;<\/li>\n<li>manual and training references; and<\/li>\n<li>claims.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\uadf8\ub9cc\ud07c <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/oem-odm\/\">SHEFMON OEM\/ODM page<\/a> describes customization involving exterior design, mechanical design, development, prototypes, logos, system languages, operating interfaces, functions, packaging, and manuals. These choices should enter a controlled configuration or custom-project record before they reach a quotation.<\/p>\n<h2>32. Train Sales Teams to Qualify Variant Requests<\/h2>\n<p>Sales teams should not promise a market-specific version before review. They need questions that clarify:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What problem prevents use of the standard model?<\/li>\n<li>Is the difference mandatory or preferred?<\/li>\n<li>Which market, buyer type, and professional setting are involved?<\/li>\n<li>Which exact functions and components differ?<\/li>\n<li>Is demand expected to repeat?<\/li>\n<li>Can an approved option or configuration solve it?<\/li>\n<li>What documentation and support are needed?<\/li>\n<li>Who will approve the sample and final baseline?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This turns a vague customization request into information that product and factory teams can evaluate.<\/p>\n<h2>33. Prepare Service and Installed-Base Records<\/h2>\n<p>Service teams need to identify each installed variant accurately. Records should connect:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>customer and location where appropriate;<\/li>\n<li>model, variant, and serial number;<\/li>\n<li>hardware and software version;<\/li>\n<li>supplied handles, tips, or cartridges;<\/li>\n<li>compatible parts and consumables;<\/li>\n<li>language and documentation;<\/li>\n<li>training status;<\/li>\n<li>warranty or support entitlement;<\/li>\n<li>repairs and upgrades; and<\/li>\n<li>regional restrictions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Without this information, a replacement part or software update may be selected from the standard model even when the installed device differs.<\/p>\n<h2>34. Control Changes to Active Variants<\/h2>\n<p>A component or software change may affect standard products and variants differently. The change record should identify:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>affected model and variant codes;<\/li>\n<li>current inventory and open orders;<\/li>\n<li>installed devices;<\/li>\n<li>\ud638\ud658\uc131;<\/li>\n<li>verification required;<\/li>\n<li>supplier and production documents;<\/li>\n<li>website, catalog, quotation, and manual updates;<\/li>\n<li>spare-parts transition;<\/li>\n<li>effective serial number or date; and<\/li>\n<li>distributor communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Closing a change only in the bill of materials is insufficient when commercial and service information also depends on it.<\/p>\n<h2>35. Review Whether a Variant Should Become Standard<\/h2>\n<p>A repeated variant may reveal that the global baseline should change. Consider standardization when:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>demand appears across several independent markets;<\/li>\n<li>the change improves usability or support broadly;<\/li>\n<li>the common-core design can absorb it;<\/li>\n<li>supplier and production controls are stable;<\/li>\n<li>it reduces total portfolio complexity;<\/li>\n<li>training and service become simpler; and<\/li>\n<li>the commercial benefit exceeds migration cost.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Standardization still requires impact review. Existing inventory, installed devices, manuals, spares, and model positioning may need a transition plan.<\/p>\n<h2>36. Consolidate or Retire Weak Variants<\/h2>\n<p>A variant should be reviewed when orders are rare, support cost is high, suppliers are unstable, the regional requirement has changed, or another approved version can replace it.<\/p>\n<p>The retirement plan should cover:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>open quotations and orders;<\/li>\n<li>distributor notification;<\/li>\n<li>finished goods and unique components;<\/li>\n<li>installed units;<\/li>\n<li>warranty and service;<\/li>\n<li>spare parts and consumables;<\/li>\n<li>replacement configuration;<\/li>\n<li>website and catalog updates; and<\/li>\n<li>end date for new production.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Removing a version from a price list does not end the factory&#8217;s obligations to units already shipped.<\/p>\n<h2>37. Use Cross-Functional Variant Governance<\/h2>\n<p>Variant decisions require several owners:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>regional and sales teams provide market evidence;<\/li>\n<li>product management defines portfolio role and decision path;<\/li>\n<li>engineering assesses technical impact;<\/li>\n<li>quality defines verification and release needs;<\/li>\n<li>sourcing evaluates components and suppliers;<\/li>\n<li>production assesses process, tooling, testing, and capacity;<\/li>\n<li>documentation controls language, labels, manuals, and training;<\/li>\n<li>service evaluates parts, skills, and installed-base support; and<\/li>\n<li>authorized leadership approves resource and portfolio commitments.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>One team can initiate a request, but it should not approve consequences owned by other functions.<\/p>\n<h2>38. Common Standardization and Variant Errors<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Calling every buyer preference a market requirement.<\/li>\n<li>Using one model name for technically different products without configuration records.<\/li>\n<li>Creating a separate model for every accessory package.<\/li>\n<li>Treating language, plug, voltage, and power architecture as one type of change.<\/li>\n<li>Offering every compatible handle as standard equipment.<\/li>\n<li>Allowing sales material to define a configuration before factory approval.<\/li>\n<li>Loading different software without recording its hardware compatibility.<\/li>\n<li>Forecasting only the base model while purchasing variant-specific parts.<\/li>\n<li>Shipping a variant without matching manuals, labels, and training.<\/li>\n<li>Assuming standard-model verification covers every changed element.<\/li>\n<li>Forgetting spares and consumables for low-volume variants.<\/li>\n<li>Keeping variants active after demand and support value disappear.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>39. Standard Model and Market Variant Checklist<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"checklist\">\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>The standard model has an approved hardware, software, component, test, document, and accessory baseline.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>The market request identifies buyer, region, reason, demand evidence, and required timing.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>Mandatory requirements are separated from preferences.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>The change is classified as documentation, option, configuration, variant, separate model, or custom project.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>The smallest effective and controllable response has been selected.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>Common and unique parts of the design are identified.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>Technical, quality, market, supply, production, inventory, documentation, and service impacts are reviewed.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>The variant has a unique code and configuration record.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>Verification matches the impact of the change.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>Quotations, orders, factory records, labels, manuals, and service systems use the same identity.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>Forecasts include exact market-specific configurations.<\/li>\n<li class=\"task\"><input disabled=\"disabled\" type=\"checkbox\" \/>The variant has an owner, review date, and criteria for standardization, restriction, or retirement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>\uc790\uc8fc \ubb3b\ub294 \uc9c8\ubb38<\/h2>\n<h3>1. Should every market request create a beauty device variant?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The factory should first check whether approved documentation, an option, a standard configuration, training, or a commercial explanation can solve the problem. A variant is appropriate when a defined market needs a controlled difference with technical or operational consequences.<\/p>\n<h3>2. What is the difference between a configuration and a variant?<\/h3>\n<p>A configuration combines approved elements within the product&#8217;s existing boundaries. A variant changes a controlled technical, software, electrical, documentary, or regional baseline that needs separate identity and review.<\/p>\n<h3>3. When should a market variant become a separate model?<\/h3>\n<p>It may need separate model status when it serves a different buyer or application, changes core architecture or performance, requires substantially different production and support, or can no longer be explained as a version of the original product.<\/p>\n<h3>4. How can factories reduce variant inventory?<\/h3>\n<p>They can maximize common components, use controlled modular choices, delay market-specific finalization, forecast by exact configuration, limit finished goods, and retire versions that no longer justify unique inventory.<\/p>\n<h3>5. Can software replace hardware variants?<\/h3>\n<p>Sometimes. Language, interface, parameters, and feature availability may be controlled through software when the hardware safely supports them. The software state still needs version identity, compatibility, verification, production loading, and service control.<\/p>\n<h3>6. How should distributors request a regional variant?<\/h3>\n<p>They should provide the destination market, buyer type, standard model, exact requested difference, reason it is required, demand evidence, order context, documentation needs, service capability, and approval contacts.<\/p>\n<h3>7. Why do low-volume variants create high support costs?<\/h3>\n<p>Even a small number of units can require unique components, manuals, training, spare parts, software, technician knowledge, inventory, and long-term compatibility records.<\/p>\n<h3>8. How should handles and consumables be controlled across variants?<\/h3>\n<p>Each item should have a part identity, compatible model and version, operating limits, documentation, packaging, test or inspection requirement, replacement rule, and reorder path.<\/p>\n<h3>9. When should a factory retire a market-specific version?<\/h3>\n<p>Retirement may be appropriate when demand disappears, another approved configuration replaces it, components become difficult to control, or support burden exceeds its strategic value. Installed units still need a documented transition plan.<\/p>\n<h3>10. How can buyers discuss standard and customized versions with SHEFMON?<\/h3>\n<p>Start with the standard model and list every requested difference in language, voltage, plug, software, handles, consumables, branding, packaging, manuals, and intended market. Then <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/contact\/\">\uc170\ud504\ubaac\uc5d0\uac8c \uc5f0\ub77d\ud558\uc138\uc694<\/a> so the team can determine whether the request fits an option, configuration, market variant, or OEM\/ODM project.<\/p>\n<h2>\uacb0\ub860<\/h2>\n<p>Standard models give beauty device factories a stable foundation for engineering, purchasing, production, quality, training, and service. Market-specific variants allow that foundation to serve legitimate regional and buyer requirements. The balance depends on protecting the common core while controlling every approved difference.<\/p>\n<p>Factories can achieve this by qualifying requests, choosing the lowest necessary level of variation, assigning exact identities, matching verification to change impact, and including inventory and installed-base obligations in the decision. Variants should remain visible from quotation through production and service, then be standardized, restricted, consolidated, or retired as evidence changes.<\/p>\n<p>\ud0d0\uc0c9\ud574 \ubcf4\uc138\uc694 <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/beauty-machines\/\">SHEFMON beauty device portfolio<\/a>, review its <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/oem-odm\/\">OEM\/ODM \ub9de\ucda4 \uc81c\uc791 \uae30\ub2a5<\/a>, \ub610\ub294 <a href=\"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/contact\/\">\uc170\ud504\ubaac\uc5d0\uac8c \uc5f0\ub77d\ud558\uc138\uc694<\/a> to discuss a standard model, regional configuration, or controlled custom project.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Beauty device factories serve markets that differ in language, electrical supply, distributor capabilities, professional settings, treatment preferences, documentation, packaging, and<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":18871,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-beauty-knowledge"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18872,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18870\/revisions\/18872"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shefmon.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18870"}],"curies":[{"name":"\uc6cc\ub4dc\ud504\ub808\uc2a4","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}